Crowd data is only worth anything if it's honest. These are the rules we hold ourselves to, published so you can hold us to them too.
We ask what you paid, what it included, and how the service handled billing, cancellation, shipping, and support. We refuse health information — no weight, no side effects, no dosing, no medical outcomes. Submissions containing it are rejected in moderation. We don't want that data, we don't store it, and testimonial-style health claims are exactly what makes health sites untrustworthy.
Health details. Identifying information about you or a named employee. Competitor attacks and provider astroturf (we watch submission patterns and timing clusters). Defamatory factual claims we can't support. Links. Anything over the length cap.
The sites we compete with publish star ratings nobody can audit, and some publish reviews of themselves. A crowd price record is more useful than either — it's checkable, it improves the index, and it belongs to readers rather than to marketing budgets. The full internal design, including moderation mechanics, is in our repository as a public document.